RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?
- From: "Hollis, Les" <Les.Hollis@xxxxxx>
- To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>, "Carel-Jan Engel" <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:28:24 -0500
Geez guys 28 emails about this subject.....think it's beaten to death
by now....
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:58 PM
To: Carel-Jan Engel
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification?
On 6/2/05, Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 00:01, Jared Still wrote:=20
>=20
> *> I agree it could still be a SPOF but it certainly is redundant
component=20
> > wise...
>=20
> SANs will and do fail.*
>=20
> Oh yes, they do fail. Don't get me started.......
>=20
>=20
Well, why not. :)
Tell us about a SAN failure you can discuss.
I've experienced some, but a public forum is not a good place
for me to vent about it.
--=20
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
