RE: Oracle 10 G
- From: "Mercadante, Thomas F" <thomas.mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:13:42 -0400
Ana,
You have evidence at your site that 10G is not stable. Why are you
considering rolling the dice? It's your job on the line, not a $2 bet at
Atlantic City.
I'd go with 9i. In 9 months to a year, I'd consider 10G.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-----Original Message-----
From: Ana Choto [mailto:achoto@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:39 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Oracle 10 G
We're contemplating the task of upgrading our current 8.1.7.4 datawarehouse
and are trying to decide whether to go to 10 G or to 9i. We'd like to
upgrade to 10 G but are not sure if it's the right choice as 10 G is so new.
We have an instance of 10 G installed, but we didn't install grid control,
just database control. On a daily basis we have 40 packages that become
invalid, and there are errors on the emagent.trc log. Oracle support hasn't
been able to give us an explanation or solution for this.
We have three 9i production databases and we don't have any problems with
them, they are very stable.
If someone out there is using 10 G on a production environment we'd like to
know, and we'd like for them to share their experiences with us. Whatever
you can tell us will help us in making the decision to go 10 G or 9i.
We're on Sun Sparc Solaris, 64 bit, 5.8.
Thanks
Ana E. Choto
American University
e-Operations - Information Technology
Phone (202) 885-2275
Fax (202) 885-2224
---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
---
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To read recent messages - //freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/09-2004
Other related posts:
