Re: OT Discussion- Priority of Performance Tuning...
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l List <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:19:31 -0600
I think this thread started because I took exception to the comment "priorities
for the business may not be the same as a priority for the DBA?s". IMO they
should be the same, i.e. the DBA should not make something a priority if it is
not a priority for the business, has their backing. The only exception to that
rule is when it comes to backups. That must be a priority for the DBA even if
the business does not understand the priority of it - although they need to be
reminded of it at every opportunity. With backups the priority would become
obvious to the business only when it is too late.
I'm curious about the opinions on that. Not the last bit about backups. I hope
we do not have any disagreement there.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
