Re: OT: Database design question
- From: Stephane Faroult <sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:11:09 +0100
Nuno,
You're missing on the main quality of "generic" databases ;-):
If you add a column to a table, it's development.
If you insert a row in a table, it's "parameterization" and it
justifies the fact that your COTS package can do everything including
the kitchen sink.
Moreover, in one case the job can be done by a (relatively low paid)
developer, while in the second one it requires an overpriced functional
consultant.
Stéphane Faroult
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 18:57 +1100, Nuno Souto wrote:
> Well, it's certainly what it was invented for: to avoid
> the problems caused by "generic" databases.
> And why those (the generic dbs) should never be allowed to
> go ahead: they really solve nothing and only create longer
> term problems. Then again, "long term" is something
> contrary to modern "design" techniques, so take your pick....
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
