Re: OMF or not OMF? DBCA or Manual scripts
- From: "Rich Jesse" <rjoralist3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:14:23 -0500 (CDT)
> We use dbca to create the database but also have it generate the scripts so
> that if something happens that requires the database to be rebuilt we can go
> back to the generated scripts and not miss anything.
It seems I'm the only stick in the mud who doesn't like using DBCA. I just
gave it another shot on 11.2.0.3 to make sure it's still a terrible GUI.
If one accepts the defaults for datafiles it might be OK, but I have yet to
be able to modify the default datafiles without GUI corruption. Maybe if I
type slow and don't make mistakes, but that's hardly practical.
Every new release, I do use it to see what new items it adds to the script
generation, but that's it. I don't like tools that make it easy for a Jr.
DBA to screw up, as the default template includes licensed options (which
are also a major pain to remove post-install, from experience). And with
the GUI issues, I just don't trust it to properly create my databases.
No OMF. No ASM. No DBCA. They are (potentially) answers to problems I
don't have, and include or have included major bugs that I don't need. As a
solo DBA, there is just no ROI that anyone's been able to prove for me to
use them.
Sigh. I don't get to attend the Cool Tool Party...again. APEX! I love
APEX! Does that count? :)
Rich
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
