Re: OFA - dump destinations
- From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:02:28 -0800
Speaking off the cuff, I can't think of a technical reason.
I wouldn't do it, as I like to keep the users trace files separate
from the alert log and system trace files.
Setting _trace_files_public may raise some issues when udump
and bdump point to the same directory, though I have not tried it.
How about cdump? Why not put them there as well?
Jared
Mark Moynahan <Mark.Moynahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
02/03/2004 01:51 PM
Please respond to oracle-l
To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: OFA - dump destinations
We are currently working installing a 9i db on a new box. The senior dba
wants to put all trace files into one directory on $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/log.
I've suggested that this is not the best practice prescribed by OFA. Does
anyone see any major issues with keeping all trace files in one directory?
Thanks,
Mark
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
