RE: No time for DB patch?

  • From: "Matthew Parker" <dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gogala.mladen@xxxxxxxxx>, "'oracle-l'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:14:46 -0700

The reference to dba_registry_sqlpatch view is in the patch notes that come 
with the Quarterly PSUs.

 

 

Matthew Parker

Chief Technologist

Dimensional DBA

425-891-7934 (cell)

D&B 047931344

CAGE 7J5S7

 <mailto:Dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx> Dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx

 <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-parker/6/51b/944/> View Matthew Parker's 
profile on LinkedIn

 <http://www.dimensionaldba.com/> www.dimensionaldba.com

 

 

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Matthew Parker
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 6:09 PM
To: gogala.mladen@xxxxxxxxx; 'oracle-l' <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: No time for DB patch?

 

For 12c the information is stored in dba_registry_sqlpatch, new functionality 
when datapatch runs.

 

 

Matthew Parker

Chief Technologist

Dimensional DBA

425-891-7934 (cell)

D&B 047931344

CAGE 7J5S7

 <mailto:Dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx> Dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx

 <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matthew-parker/6/51b/944/> View Matthew Parker's 
profile on LinkedIn

 <http://www.dimensionaldba.com/> www.dimensionaldba.com

 

 

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:04 PM
To: oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: No time for DB patch?

 

I am patching my database with the latest and the greatest patch sets available 
today. All was well, I haven't run into any issues. However, when I want to 
check the result, here is what I see:

SQL> select action_time,version,comments from dbA_registry_history order by 
1;ACTION_TIME  VERSION                 COMMENTS                                
05/18/15     12.1.0.2.3OJVMBP        RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
11/06/15     12.1.0.2.5OJVMBP        RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
01/20/16     12.1.0.2.6OJVMBP        RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
07/30/16     12.1.0.2.160719OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
11/06/16     12.1.0.2.160719OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
01/28/17     12.1.0.2.170117OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
05/10/17     12.1.0.2.170418OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
07/27/17     12.1.0.2.170718OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql                          
             12.1.0.2                RDBMS_12.1.0.2.0DBPSU_LINUX.X64_161210  
 
 
9 rows selected. 
 
Elapsed: 00:00:00.342
 

The same query gives the following result on my 12.2 instance:


SQL> select action_time,version,comments from dbA_registry_history order by 1;
ACTION_TIME  VERSION   COMMENTS                           
             12.2.0.1    RDBMS_12.2.0.1.0_LINUX.X64_170125  


Elapsed: 00:00:00.003

In both cases, the action time for the DB PSU is missing. The time for the 
JavaVM PSU is shown without a problem, but there is no time for DB PSU.  On the 
other hand, version 11 works as advertised:

Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options


SQL> alter session set nls_timestamp_format='MM/DD/YY';

Session altered.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.004
SQL> set sqlformat ansiconsole
SQL> select action_time,version,comments from dbA_registry_history order by 1;
ACTION_TIME  VERSION                 COMMENTS                
08/24/13     11.2.0.4                Patchset 11.2.0.2.0     
02/17/17     11.2.0.4.170117OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql          
02/17/17     11.2.0.4                PSU 11.2.0.4.161018     
05/10/17     11.2.0.4.170418OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql          
05/10/17     11.2.0.4                PSU 11.2.0.4.170418     
05/10/17     11.2.0.4.170418OJVMPSU  OJVM PSU post-install   
05/10/17                             Patch 25434033 applied  
07/27/17     11.2.0.4.170718OJVMPSU  RAN jvmpsu.sql          
07/27/17     11.2.0.4                PSU 11.2.0.4.170718     
07/27/17     11.2.0.4.170718OJVMPSU  OJVM PSU post-install   
07/27/17                             Patch 26027154 applied  


11 rows selected. 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.326

Is it just a simple omission or there is some kind of motivation behind this? 
Also, there is no Java VM PSU for 12.2? Did Oracle Corp. finally come to the 
sensible conclusion that Java is no good and decided to adopt Perl everywhere?

Other related posts: