I personal don't have first hand experience wih this but... a while back on another list there was a long thread on the very subject. Seems it all has mostly to do with "Little Endian" vs. "Big Endian". http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/b/big_endian.html Once of the dba's on the list promised that he regularly moved (copied)=20 his Oracle database on windows x86 (NTFS?) to Red Hat Linux x86 (EXT3?). I never got the time to try it. I do remember that several people on the list (smarter than I) explained clearly that=20 it was NOT the file system type that makes the difference but "Little Endian" vs. "Big Endian" issue. hth Chris Marquez Oracle DBA HEYMONitor(tm) - heymonitor.com "Oracle Monitoring & Alerting Solution" -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of biti_rainy Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:24 AM To: oracle-l Subject: (NEW) very interesting thing about migrate db from different OS(oracle 9.2.0.4,not 10G) hi,all we find a very interesting thing: we copy the WINDOWS2000 datafile to linux (they have the same byte order) and , dd a linux datafile header to cover the windows datafile header(the header block is not include in dba_data_files),the block is not seem in database ,it is for OS. ls -l can see ,the datafile size is bigger than dba_data_files for one oracle block. when we change the OS file header,we can create controlfile and open the database ,and we can query /create table ... etc. the db version is oracle9204,not 10g. and someone told me that he can copy the datafile from windows and solaris for x86 pc to linux , and not change the header with oracle8i. is there someone can discuss it? =20 Best regards msn: biti_rainy@xxxxxxxxxxx a dba from alibaba(china) -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l