Re: Moving to RAC`
- From: "Mladen Gogala" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "mgogala@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 12:35:54 -0500
On 03/01/2015 07:45 AM, Andrew Kerber wrote:
Hey Mladen - he said the need for RAC wasn't part of this discussion. So let's
not worry about it and just advise him on his question.
So one other thing to keep in mind. Companies may certify their application in
RAC and only mean there is nothing in RAC that will break their App. Eg, the
sequence issue mentioned before. That does not mean their app is suitable for
RAC and will scale well in a RAC environment.
Sent from my iPhone
But the answer to the question is crucial. If he wants to achieve more
resilience and fault tolerance, he needs to set the system up one way
and if he needs to run reports, it's another setup, and if the system is
a DW system, it's yet another set of settings. To tell him how to scale,
I must know what does he want to do and why. That's the philosophical
catch 22.5.
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
http://mgogala.freehostia.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
