Re: Moving to 64-bit Oracle on Solaris 5.8
- From: zhu chao <zhuchao@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:07:53 +0800
So do the shared_pool_size, as some note says.
But I haven't seen you need to double the sort_area_size anywhere.
Interesting. Wondering how to verify it.As sort seems more like data
buffer other than shared pool, which is 32/64bit related?
Thanks.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:45:05 -0400, Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gudmundur,
>
> I read (from a good, known source) that you may want to double your
> sort_area_size as the pointers will take up twice as much space in
> memory.
>
> I haven't tested this out myself, will do so after I get an AMD 64 laptop.
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:03:44 +0000, Gudmundur Josepsson <gbj@xxxxxxxx> wrot=
> e:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > Are there any known 'gotchas' for moving from 32-bit Oracle to 64-bit
> > on Solaris 5.8? (Yes, we will RTFM :-)
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> > Gudmundur
> >=20
> > =DEessi p=F3stur var sendur me=F0 vefp=F3sti mi, http://www.mi.is
> >=20
>
>
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
Regards
Zhu Chao
www.cnoug.org
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
