I actually favor bottom quoting. Then I don't have to scroll down to the bottom past all the quoting - which I may already have read in the followed-up post - to get to what the poster has to say. jungwolf wrote: > > I agree. I'd also suggest top quoting instead of bottom quoting > (putting the quoted, original message at the top instead of at the > bottom). This helps in many ways: posts can be read in chronological -- Regards Wolfgang Breitling Centrex Consulting Corporation www.centrexcc.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l