Re: MODIFY Materialized View Definition without dropping it (or the MLog) after base table alter?

  • From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Alberto Dell'Era" <alberto.dellera@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:33:44 -0800

On 11/28/06, Alberto Dell'Era <alberto.dellera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think there's a misunderstanding here, I was just asking to Chris
whether the new column, that has to be added on the base table,
possibly with a default value, has to be propagated to the MV also (so
with the same value) or not.

Eg
old mv : create materialized view as select a from t@dblink
say you "alter table t add (new_column int default 42)"
has the mv to be logically modified to
create materialized view as select a, new_column from t@dblink
or does it stay the same, ignoring new_column ?


Ah, I see.

If that were the case, there's little else to do.

Adding a column to the table does not invalidate any of the
objects used for the materialized view, and it will still work
properly.


--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

Other related posts: