Re: Is it just me (WHO columns)

  • From: Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:11:14 +1000

Mark W. Farnham apparently said,on my timestamp of 13/08/2004 11:36 PM:

> life. I'm not sure whether my knowledge of them is still subject to
> non-disclosure, so I won't quote the standards (which date from at least
> 1987) here.

Where I work there are two schools of thought on this.
One says "exactly the same as e-Business suite".
Another says "last changed by, timestamp and row status flag".
I like this second one: simple and just about covers everything.


> archiving, which you could require as part of the audit requirements.

well nowadays a prod system should really be using archiving.
No matter what.  I know a few that aren't but they are in
older Oracle versions and are really small dbs that can have a
daily export done in no time at all.  Yet: it is a requirement.


-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts:

  • » Re: Is it just me (WHO columns)