RE: Is RAC DOA?

  • From: Raj Jamadagni <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:02:07 -0700 (PDT)

Correct ... we applied so many patches that I lost count. Plus what we normalyl 
do is prepare
asecond OH with new binaries etc and shutdown (if required) chande the link fo 
main OH to the new
binaries and restart ... 

Our OH always is something/current ... this points to oen of following
/something/9204
or 
/something/9204p

P is added if individual patches have been applied to the OH in question.

Raj
--- Pete Sharman <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Individual patches are now being marked as rolling upgradeable (damn that's=
>  an awful phrase!)  I think that's what Raj means.
> 
>  =
> 
> Pete
>  =


=====
Best Regards
Raj
---------------------------------------------------------
select mandatory_disclaimer from company_requirements;

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: