RE: Is RAC DOA?

  • From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 04:57:56 +1000

Damnitall, I've already bought you one bottle of Scotch - how many more do =
you want?  :)

 =

Pete
 =

"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
 =

"Oh no, it's not.  It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On Behalf Of Daniel Fink
Sent: Tuesday, 17 August 2004 4:43 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is RAC DOA?

1) Pete, you're right... I won't believe you (until you buy me a bottle of =
Scotch).

2) Would "rollable upgrade" (trademark/copyright/blah/blah/blah) be better?=
???

Dan

Pete Sharman wrote:
> Individual patches are now being marked as rolling upgradeable (damn that=
's=3D
>  an awful phrase!)  I think that's what Raj means.
> =

>  =3D
> =

> Pete
>  =3D

----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: