Thanks, Oracle claims a 10 percent increase in throughput. Sounds like they might be a bit low. We are looking at both 10g and 9i. 10g does seem to be less intrusive - at least on paper. --- "Loughmiller, Greg" <greg.loughmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pete, > > We are using it on a 9i database. It's very > intrusive, and can add some > significant overhead. Currently, the purge activity > of CDC is causing > great grief for some oracle streams activity on that > database. Once the > issue had been identified, it has become manageable. > But not ideal.. I > (in architecture) preferred not to use it, and use > something > non-intrusive to get the "data deltas". We looked at > Data Mirror and > GoldenGate. They both seem pretty good... I think > the choice between the > two depends on your requirements and data latency... > > > > Our understanding is that the 10g version of CDC is > a lot cleaner. > > > greg > > -----Original Message----- > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Peter Barnett > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:06 AM > To: Oracle-l > Subject: Is Anyone Using Change Data Capture > > The subject pretty much says it all. We are looking > for a way to maintain changes to the database for > loading downstream systems. One option is manual > scripts, another is CDC? Looking for +/- of CDC. > > Thanks, > > > > Pete Barnett > Lead Database Administrator > The Regence Group > pnbarne@xxxxxxxxxxx > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > Pete Barnett Lead Database Administrator The Regence Group pnbarne@xxxxxxxxxxx __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l