Re: IMPORTANT: Complaint about private answers in oracle-l list
- From: "stephen booth" <stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: juancarlosreyesp@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:32:14 +0100
On 31/03/06, Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco <juancarlosreyesp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi :)
> I can be wrong,
>
> But personally I had seen several people who only answer offline about
> database topics, and I must say very good answer that should be done publicly.
If you look at the mail headers of a message on the list you'll see
that the reply-to header has been set so replies go back to the person
who sent it rather than the list.
If you look at the list's page on freelists.org you'll see:
"In general, the value density of threads is greatest if the initiator
asks for responses off the list and then later posts a summary of
those responses to the list."
I guess that's why the header is set. Personally I disagree with that
reasoning, my expereience is that in general debate in public is more
valuable and that the initiator rarely posts a summary (or if they do
it's just a copy and paste of all the replies into a single mail with
no removal of duplicates or inaccuracies). There's also the
recruitment factor, if I see a list with lots of long threads I'm more
likley to join than I am a list where apparently few if any questions
get a response (because responses are off list and initators rarely
post a followup).
Stephen
--
It's better to ask a silly question than to make a silly assumption.
http://stephensorablog.blogspot.com/
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
