Re: High Availability Options
- From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:20:54 -0300
It depends on HA for what.
For Database, then you have DataGuard which in my experience covers most HA
needs. You do have RAC, but RAC introduces a whole new level of complexity
and therefore a new potential point of failure. As Niall mentioned you have
various replication methods as well.
I guess the real question is what is the business need (the REAL business
need) and then we can tell you what kind of HA/replication we use.
hth
Alan.-
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Niall Litchfield <
niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Standby, streams, replication, snap mirrors .......
>
> On 20 Oct 2010 18:14, "Michael Dinh" <mdinh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I am curious as to what options are available for HA and what you are
> using.
>
>
>
> I have the following list:
>
>
>
> Veritas Cluster Server
>
> VMware VMotion
>
> Oracle RAC
>
>
>
> Ideally, we want to stick with Solaris.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Michael Dinh
>
>
>
> NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY - This material is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> laws. BE FURTHER ADVISED THAT THIS EMAIL MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED HEALTH
> INFORMATION (PHI). BY ACCEPTING THIS MESSAGE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOREGOING,
> AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: YOU AGREE TO NOT DISCLOSE TO ANY THIRD PARTY ANY PHI
> CONTAINED HEREIN, EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT
> NECESSARY TO PERFORM YOUR OBLIGATIONS RELATING TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS
> MESSAGE. If the reader of this email (and attachments) is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the
> sender of the error and delete the e-mail you received. Thank you.
>
>
Other related posts:
