RE: Help interpreting 10046 trace file anomaly

  • From: "Aponte, Tony" <AponteT@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 17:35:43 -0400

Sorry for the late reply (playing catch-up after one heck of a month.)
The anomaly hasn't been seen in over 1,500 gig of trace files since
first occurrence.  I'm chucking it to a one-time CPU starvation problem.

Thanks anyway
Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Fink [mailto:Daniel.Fink@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Help interpreting 10046 trace file anomaly


Tony,

Some basic questions:
Is this a common problem? Or did it happen just this one time?
What is the application configuration?
Would it be possible to get more lines from the trace file?

I'm wondering what consumed the real time between the fetch and the
sql*net message. I'm hoping that a few more lines from the trace=20
  file might make some sense of it.

Daniel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: