Re: From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?

From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@xxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:40:30 -0400

On 03/15/2018 11:57 AM, Niall Litchfield wrote:

agree with all of the above. I disagree with the suggestion though.

Firstly ORACLE-L has, currently, a high signal-noise ratio. A *very* high signal-noise ratio. I strongly suspect the widening of scope to other RDBMS systems (I assume that is what Tim intended rather than DBMS) would reduce this.

Why are we paying the list administrator?

--
Mladen Gogala
Database Consultant
Tel: (347) 321-1217

References:
- Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Rich J
- Re: Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Arian Stijf
- Re: Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Andy Sayer
- RE: Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Noveljic Nenad
- RE: Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Jeff Smith
- Re: Thoughts on implicit/auto COMMITs
  - From: Rich J
- From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?
  - From: Tim Gorman
- Re: From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?
  - From: Niall Litchfield

Re: From ORACLE-L to DATABASE-L?

Other related posts: