FW: Use the existing RAC. . . or build another one?

  • From: "Hubler, Daniel" <daniel.hubler@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:56:00 +0000

Something I should have made clear (and thanks to Chris Taylor and Chris Ruel):


Funds are available to either grow the existing environment, or acquire the
resources needed to build a new one.


So my question is more of a "best practices" idea.


Thanks again to all.





Daniel Hubler
Aurora Healthcare
IT Infrastructure
daniel.hubler@xxxxxxxxxx

From: Hubler, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:27 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Use the existing RAC. . . or build another one?

We have to decide if we are going to put a new database instance in our
existing 2-node RAC,
or build a second cluster for the new database.

We are talking 2 separate off-the-shelf products from a single vendor; the
vendor will not support putting the 2 schemas into a single database.

The 2 products are tied very closely together; but do operate independently
when/if necessary.

We are debating amongst ourselves the pros/cons of each strategy.

Any comments/suggestions/war-stories would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Other related posts: