Re: Excessive transaction tables consistent reads - undo records applied in 11.2.0.3

  • From: Tanel Poder <tanel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:24:40 +0300

I wouldn't use it in production mainly because it's almost completely
unknown event and nobody's using it, so who knows which extra bugs you may
hit (e.g. combining this with direct path reads, PX, smart scans etc).
Tanel.

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Mark W. Farnham <mwf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Interesting. I'll need to check whether fts is subject to adaptive direct
> read with that event on, with and without rownum limits.
>
>


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: