Exadata + OMCS

  • From: "Stephens, Chris" <Chris.Stephens@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:05:02 -0600

My employer went big with Oracle engineered systems in the last year and due to 
lack of in-house experience, contracted with Oracle Managed Cloud Services to 
assist in managing the environment which consists of Exalytics, Exalogic, 
Exadata.

I get the impression that it's not common for OMCS to manage systems that 
reside in a customer's data centers vs at Oracle data centers but that's what 
we have.

At this point, all I care about are the Exadata machines which are currently 
just two ¼ racks.

After recently managing to get some access to the dev/test Exadata machine, 
I've discovered that they are doing a number of things which I believe will 
become a maintenance nightmare down the road. ...probably about the same time 
we bring administration of these machines back in house

Each database (currently 9) is installed under a different OS user under a 
unique Oracle home.  They claim this is necessary so that each database can be 
patched separately and maintained at different versions.  I strongly prefer the 
default to be all databases reside in a common home under a common OS user 
(oracle) with case by case decisions being made to migrate databases to a new 
home for legitimate business reasons.

Actually, I would prefer more discretion in the decision to create a new 
database for each new application but that's more my company's fault vs OMCS.

OMCS is also steamrolling us with their database naming conventions which 
appear to start with P|D|T followed by my employers initials followed by random 
numbers or letters with include upper case O's and zeros.  This is infuriating. 
They are doing this to make it easier for them to manage our databases in their 
environment.  These are our databases and we would like names that give some 
indication of their purpose.  The ending in a number is a pain in the butt with 
RAC databases and the letter O vs number 0 is killing me too.  They say this 
isn't negotiable.

I have several more complaints but I'll refrain from making this too long.

What do you think of these standards?  Is there anyone out there that uses OMCS 
to manage their Exadata environment?  Any comments on how that is going?

Any comments/input are appreciated.

Chris


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is 
not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering 
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by email reply.


Other related posts: