"It is a common misconception that Oracle online redo logs will benefit by moving them on EFDs, whereas all the experimental data indicates the opposite position" page 17 http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h5967-leveraging-clariion-cx4-oracle-deploy-wp.pdf On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Robert Freeman <robertgfreeman@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Flash disks for WRITE operations are actually not that fast. I don't have >> the performance numbers here, but you really don't buy anything in terms of >> write performance with flash disks. So I would not recommend them for a disk >> group that will contain, say, online redo logs. > > Interesting observation Robert. > From the two guys at LSI that test flash memory with Oracle: > "Online redo logs are best handled by Hard Disk Drives because of the > sequential writes" -- Regards, Greg Rahn http://structureddata.org -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l