On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 19:07, Thomas Jeff wrote: > >From the 10046 traces, the performance of the update on the first table > is clearly far better then on the 2nd table. Just one update on the > 2nd table is taking an average of 2 seconds to complete. Is that one row that is taking 2 seconds? If not, how many blocks are affected? (indexes and table) Jared ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------