Re: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: warren.puziewicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:34:22 +0000
I guess my question would be how many SMP servers do you typically find you
have outgrown in the lifecycle of either the hardware (typically 3-5 years
in my experience) or the software (often less than that). The follow up
question is of course how many systems do the project sponsors suggest will
outgrow a single server in that lifetime :) .
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Warren Puziewicz <
warren.puziewicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With all the anti-RAC sentiments being expressed in this thread, I have a
> question:
>
>
>
> If not RAC, then what does everyone recommend in its place? A single SMP
> server would certainly be easier to administer, but then you’re into
> forklift upgrades when you outgrow it.
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
