Re: Diff between TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY parameter and PRESERVE_COMMIT_ORDER parameter in DBMS_LOGSTDBY.APPLY_SET
- From: sundar mahadevan <sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Mihajlo Tekic <mihajlo.tekic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:20:45 -0500
Many Thanks Mihajlo. This is what I wanted to know. I read about the
TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY parameter being deprecated on one of my online
search result but I was unable to find the page again. Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mihajlo Tekic <mihajlo.tekic@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Sundar,
>
> Starting from 10.2 TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY parameter has been replaced with
> PRESERVE_COMMIT_ORDER.
>
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_lsbydb.htm#BABCJHGH
> ~Mihajlo
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:53 AM, sundar mahadevan <
> sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Group,
>> This email was not replied by anyone in the group. I would like to bump it
>> up to give it a try. Appreciate if someone could enlighten me on this.
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:26 PM, sundar mahadevan <
>> sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> Greetings. Background: 1 primary (10.3) with 1 logical standby (10.3) on
>>> solaris sparc 64 bit.
>>>
>>> 1) I would like to know the difference between TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY
>>> parameter and PRESERVE_COMMIT_ORDER parameter in DBMS_LOGSTDBY.APPLY_SET. I
>>> searched for these parameters online and tried to understand but I cannot
>>> completely point out the differences. My Google search results on
>>> TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY refer to 9.2 version while PRESERVE_COMMIT_ORDER
>>> refer to 10.1+ version.
>>> 2) Has TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY been replaced by PRESERVE_COMMIT_ORDER? or
>>> is TRANSACTION_CONSISTENCY still valid?
>>>
>>> Please help. Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
