Re: Developers wanting individual Unit Test (no data) databases - suggestions?

  • From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Chris Taylor <christopherdtaylor1994@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:25:20 -0500

Well, I would think they would need some data to test everything.  It would
take some work, but you could create a seed database on a vm template that
you could clone and hand out as needed.

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Chris Taylor <
christopherdtaylor1994@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Partially would but they're wanting their own individual instances so they
can run their tests without checking to see if someone else is already
using the environment.

Chris

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Rich J <rjoralist3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 2017/08/11 12:25, Chris Taylor wrote:

We've got a relatively large development group who want to have many Unit
Test databases (without data) that they can spin up on demand and destroy
when done.

I'm curious what products are available that could facilitate something
like this?



Going in a potentially less-complicated route, couldn't a metadata-only
datapump over a network link work for this?  One could even have an
on-demand Scheduler job to kick it off.

Just a thought...

Rich





-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

Other related posts: