"One other point to keep in mind is that the ODA does not do rolling patches" Why not, Seth? On 15 April 2014 18:07, Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GG, > > I think you are making some assumptions that Chris has already said are > not relevant, specifically that processing differences are not a problem. > If his workload idles on an Exadata and idles on an ODA, why would memory, > smart scan, CPUs, I/O, etc. be an issue? > > As many have already mentioned, get the SLA in writing and test the > workload on the DR system. > > One other point to keep in mind is that the ODA does not do rolling > patches. If this is a maintenance requirement and the ODA becomes your > primary database, you'll have a problem. > > Seth Miller > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:07 PM, GG <grzegorzof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Are You kidding guys ? >> >> from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database- >> appliance/oracle-database-appliance-faq-1903200.pdf >> The Oracle Database Appliance X4-2 is a 4U rack-mountable >> system with two servers and one storage shelf. The two >> servers each contain two 12-core Intel Xeon Processors E5- >> 2697 v2 and 256 GB of memory for a total of 48 processor >> cores and 512 GB of memory per appliance >> >> The Oracle Database Appliance base configuration contains 18 >> TB of raw SAS storage, offering 9 TB double-mirrored or 6 >> TB triple-mirrored of resilient usable database storage. There >> are also four 200 GB solid state drives for high performance >> processing of database redo logs. >> >> >> and You want to switchover/failover to that from X3 in memory database ? >> :) Good luck . >> The only reason I can think of using ODA as DR for EXA is to have >> positive answer for Boss question 'do we have DR solution' ? >> As DBA You can only pray disaster never happen :). >> >> Regards >> GG >> >> -- >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l >> >> >> >