Re: Dataguard Exadata -> Database Appliance
- From: Hemant K Chitale <hemantkchitale@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Chris.Stephens@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:15:11 +0800
Storage capacity difference ?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Stephens, Chris <Chris.Stephens@xxxxxxx>wrote:
> I was just asked by management whether it would be possible to run
> Dataguard from Exadata (Primary) to a Database Appliance (Standby). I
> can’t think of a reason why that wouldn’t be *possible*.
>
>
>
> I’m not sure that’s the question they are actually asking though which
> is: Would it be justifiable for us to save some money and run our standby
> on cheaper hardware (and consequently software licensing)?
>
>
>
> I don’t think processing power differences will be a problem for quite
> some time. The biggest drawback I can think of is that all of a sudden you
> have to keep OS/GI (running RAC)/RDBMS versions and patching at the same
> level.
>
>
>
> What else am I not thinking of? …how bad of an idea is it?
>
>
>
> I would have even really considered it as a possibility but then I don’t
> pay the bills or have to justify them either.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help with this.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>
>
>
--
Hemant K Chitale
http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com
http://hemantscribbles.blogspot.com
Other related posts:
