RE: DBAs running root.sh

  • From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <hacketta_57@xxxxxx>, "'oracle-l digest users'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 09:59:22 -0500

The old solution from Burlington Coat was based on a password envelope in
the operations safe. In a lights out shop I'm not sure how to do this.

1) A DBA (or anyone really) on the temporary root list calls operations.
2) Ops opens the safe, verifies the identity of the caller, opens that
person's password envelope and give them the sudo root password for the
system(s) needed.
3) Op notes to SA group systems given
4) Temporary rooter logs everything done (script if possible), notifies SA
group when done
5) SA group creates new password envelope (with new passwords, having
changed them) for the ops safe, reviews what was done, gives feedback to DBA
(could be as little as "seems right and necessary, thanks for letting me
sleep")

Rinse and repeat as needed. This has the nice effect that if an SA is
around, you can check with them if they can do what you need RIGHT NOW, so
you can skip the overhead of changing all the sudo passwords. This helps
create a businesslike and mutually helpful relationship amongst SAs and DBAs
(which may be its best feature).

If memory serves this process was developed by Mike Prince, Gerry Claggett,
Brad Friedman, and yours truly.

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Austin Hackett
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 12:08 PM
To: oracle-l digest users
Subject: DBAs running root.sh

Hi List

If you work in a security conscious environment, I'd be keen to hear how
your site handles the root.sh script.

To give you some background:

In my environment, DBAs are currently given direct root access to allow them
to run root.sh. However, the SA Team would like to tighten this up. If
giving the DBAs direct root access isn't acceptable (not even temporarily)
then two options spring to my mind:

1) SA team run root.sh on behalf of the DBAs.  Geography and logistics in my
organisation are such that having an SA walk over to the DBAs desk is a
realistic option. Our SAs aren't keen on this approach
2) Give DBAs the ability to run root.sh as the root user via sudo. This, of
course, means that DBAs can run anything they like by editing root.sh, so
doesn't really help. Understandably our SAs don't like this approach

I am being asked to look into keeping Oracle software version specific
root.sh scripts in a root-owned location (we are Linux only, so no
multi-platform concerns). This would allow for secure sudo privileges. We'd
need these for RDBMS, Grid Infrastructure, and Client.

However, I've explained  the scripts are dynamically generated by
runInstaller and have the Oracle Home path hard-coded into them. We'd need a
root-owned root.sh for every distinct ORACLE_HOME path we create (some hosts
have multiple homes, so there's dbhome_1, dbhome_2 etc.). Maybe there are
other considerations that I'm unaware of - I don't really like to second
guess what else is going on in the "closed box" of the OUI that could be
host dependent.

To my mind, taking this non-standard approach is  more risky than having
someone run the script on our behalf, even if it risks introducing delays
into the build process. 

How is this handled in your organisation? Have you ever been asked to have a
centralised set of root.sh scripts under root control for this reason? Have
you made it work?

If anyone has some time to share their experiences, it would be much
appreciated.

Regards

Austin






--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: