Re: DB12c in Production?
- From: Jeremy Schneider <jeremy.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:04:09 -0500
Is the extra cost option for using PDBs at all or is it for having more than
one PDB?
-Jeremy
--
http://about.me/jeremy_schneider
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:20 AM, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> Three things come to mind
>>
>> 1) The non-multi-tenant architecture is known as the 'Pre-12c' architecture.
>> In other words, in the future, we will have no choice.
>
> I agree that the wording and marketing tends to point in that direction.
> However I consider it unlikely that the old architecture will disappear any
> time soon for one major reason. Multi-tenant has been introduced as an extra
> cost option, and its an option I think a reasonable number of customers, but
> by no means all will pay for. A future decision for Oracle to drop support
> for the option would have to do one or more of the below (or some other smart
> alternative).
>
> make multi-tenant part of the base license killing a revenue stream.
> make existing customers who don't see value in multi-tenant pay for it
> (reducing a revenue stream).
> make it cost neutral or advantageous to move to multi-tenant (perhaps by
> playing with overall discount rates for those who purchase it)
> allow multi-tenant for SE customers
> I suspect that any of the above will be difficult and have unexpected side
> effects.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info
Other related posts:
