Hi Jeff, all,
some brief comments inline with full disclosure and bias, I work for Oracle
and in the MT dev. org. as product management.
On Aug 30, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Jeff Chirco <backseatdba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'ved asked this question over the last couple year to various consultants
and I think on here once. It seemed like the majority of response I got where
that people where still doing the non-CDB traditional install in Production.
I went with traditional install for a few reasons
1. In the beginning of testing NetApp storage snaps didn't support PDBs or
12.2. They do now
2. I wanted to go to 12c quicker than taking the time to learn multitenancy
3. Plus we are migrating from Windows to Linux and 11.2.0.4 to 12.2.01 at the
same time so wanted to limit the amount of things changing and learning at
once.
4. We have 4 databases running on this one server and I just though it was
silly to have 4 CDBs with 1 PDB each. Maybe this isn't, I don't know.
I really feel that Multitenancy should be included at no cost. If they want
to de-support traditional install and force us this route it should be
included. Like someone said MSSQL already has this. Or drop the price.
$17,500 per cpu is crazy. If they want use to use it and promote it, it
needs to be included or cheap enough that it is a no-brainier.
Jeff
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:25 PM Juan Miranda <jmirandavigo@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jmirandavigo@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Totally agree.
More cost and more complex administration; just what we need.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
En nombre de Mladen Gogala
Enviado el: miércoles, 29 de agosto de 2018 17:11
Para: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Asunto: Re: Create 12c or 18c database in traditional architecture
Hi Neil!
Multi-tenant doesn't make any sense because the resources it will save
are much, much cheaper than the cost of the multi-tenant option. Also,
the competitors (DB2, SQL Server, SAP Hana) are all allowing creation of
additional databases for free. I don't see why would I need to pay for
the same feature with Oracle?
Regards
On 08/29/2018 09:23 AM, Neil Chandler wrote:
Personally I think multi-tenant a decent feature but it is cost
prohibitive for what you get in return.
--
Mladen Gogala
Database Consultant
Tel: (347) 321-1217
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l ;
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.freelists.org_webpage_oracle-2Dl&d=DwMFaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=eVHM5137MVmvnDIuiRpce1B948AiZdid6KgUiIy45rk&m=JNlV1FSC-orRhijbUURGbPlgYEX-Z-b7geK-q45Jb0E&s=CnF0vOahQFkw4RJPIBIOz2MF9AbtmKlFbV9Vh-262Uo&e=>