Re: Cloning Oracle versus Installing from OUI

  • From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: mark.powell@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:06:09 +0100

I agree, hence the rather large number of comments about the necessity to
run and it's various cousins. If it was always the sysadmin doing
the install (and presumably Oracle patching and all the rest of it).

On 9/29/06, Powell, Mark D <mark.powell@xxxxxxx> wrote:

It is my experience that in UNIX and VMS environments that it is a DBA
rather than a System Administrator who peforms the Oracle software

-- Mark D Powell --
Phone (313) 592-5148

-----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yechiel Adar Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:29 AM Cc: Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Cloning Oracle versus Installing from OUI

I do not understand why you, as a dba, need to install software on a
server. This is the job of the server administrator.
We build a script that use silent install and checks the results and
give this script to the administrators.
They call us only when problems arise.
This method save a lot more time for us as we do not install.
It also saves a lot of time for them, as all they have to do is run the
script and then come later and checks if it finished OK.

Adar Yechiel
Rechovot, Israel

MVR wrote:

> All,
> This saves us lot of time(for installing 10g R2 using OUI).
> Any comments?
> Thanks


-- //

Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA

Other related posts: