RE: Centralized names resolution
- From: "Plunkett, Lyn" <Lyn.Plunkett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <topshot.rhit@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:51:34 -0600
We moved from tnsnames at each of our sites, updated via batch scripts,
to storing the tnsnames info in Active Directory, and letting AD handle
the replication for us. It's much easier to keep things in synch. It is
easier for us leverage AD rather than setting up the OID databases and
their replication.
Lyn
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Ray
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:15 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Centralized names resolution
<snip>
Is there any benefit to using OID instead? Note this isn't for some
enterprise-wide solution. While they do have plants all over the world,
it's very rare that they share database info. I'm only dealing with one
plant though it would be nice if are solution could be easily used by
others. It seems like a real pain to setup OID since you have to dig it
out of Application Server now.
<snip>
Other related posts:
