With SAP, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate between 'unsupported' and 'strongly discouraged'. Jared On 12/13/05, John Kanagaraj <john.kanagaraj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would believe that INTERNAL is a good fit for this kind of operation, > but I wouldn't assign it all to just DDL. (For example, would creation > of a Tablespace be considered DDL, although it would update TS$?) > > Yes - you can audit DDL. And by 'this vendor' you mean SAP? The question > is this: Would creation of a SYS owned database level trigger and a > SYSTEM tablespace located table (for keeping the DDL change audit trail) > interfere with SAP or worse, take you out of 'supported' configuration? > I would assume not, but then.... > > Jared may able to address the SAP bit. (if it is SAP). >