RE: CIO & flash recovery area

  • From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:51:44 -0700

No replies yet to my initial inquiry, so I guess nobody is running their flash 
recovery areas on a cio filesystem.  Oracle support referred me to the 
following link:  http://www.rampant-books.com/t_oracle_direct_i_o.htm - which 
says "Oracle recommends that all database files use Direct I/O XE "Direct I/O" 
, which is a disk access method that bypasses the additional overhead on the OS 
buffer.  One important exception to this rule is the archived redo log 
filesystem which should use OS buffer caching."
 
Can anyone think of a reason why archived redo logs should be buffered instead 
of direct/concurrent I/O?  It doesn't make sense to me.
 
Thanks,
Brandon
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On 
Behalf Of Allen, Brandon
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:59 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: CIO & flash recovery area


Howdy list,
 
Oracle support can't answer this question, so I'm turning to y'all.  I'm 
setting up a new 10.2.0.2 database on AIX 5.3 and have set 
filesytemio_options=setall in order to enable CIO (concurrent I/O) on the 
datafiles, and I have mounted the filesystems for the redologs with cio and 
agblksize=512.  All good there.  My question is on how to configure the 
filesystem for the flash recovery area - should it also be mounted with cio and 
agblksize=512?  I'm thinking cio would be good for this filesystem since the 
same blocks aren't likely to be accessed repeatedly, there is no point in 
keeping them in the filesystem buffer cache, right?  Regarding the setting of 
agblksize,  I think it depends on the I/O size Oracle uses to access the files 
in the flash recovery area (flashback database log, archived redo logs, 
datafile copies, etc.).  I'm guessing that archive logs are written in 512 byte 
blocks just like the online redo, but I don't know if that's true or not.  Do 
any of you know?  Is anyone else running your flash recovery area on CIO - what 
have your experiences been?
 
Thanks,
Brandon
 
 
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or 
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not 
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and 
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business 
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Other related posts: