RE: CBO irregularity

  • From: "Jamadagni, Rajendra" <Rajendra.Jamadagni@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:55:50 -0400

If I could have that, OWS was ready to work on it ... The SQL involves 5
tables (with thousands of rows) and a dynamically generated SQL ...
Unfortunately it was way too difficult to generate a simple reproducible
test case, trust me I tried for 2.5 days ... But couldn't do it.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com 
All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. 
select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements; 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niall Litchfield
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:47 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CBO irregularity

Not *another* CURSOR_SHARING=SIMILAR|FORCE issue? I really don't want to
hear that..

You don't happen to have a reproducible test case? 

Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:20:39 -0400, Jamadagni, Rajendra
<rajendra.jamadagni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have a specific sql which has decode statement with non-db values
> It makes things go wring with CBO and returns wrong data. Using RBO or

> cursor_sharing=exact resolves the problem

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
Archives are at
FAQ is at

Other related posts: