With BasicFiles or SecureFiles? -KJ
--
Kevin Jernigan
Senior Director Product Management
Advanced Compression, Hybrid Columnar
Compression (HCC), Database File System
(DBFS), SecureFiles, Database Smart Flash
Cache, Total Recall, Database Resource
Manager (DBRM), Direct NFS Client (dNFS),
Continuous Query Notification (CQN),
Index Organized Tables (IOT), Information
Lifecycle Management (ILM)
+1-650-607-0392 (o)
+1-415-710-8828 (m)
On 10/1/15 9:17 AM, Sheehan, Jeremy wrote:
Orlando,
I did testing and implemented a BLOB tablespace with 32K blocksize and I saw
about a 20% increase in performance when saving and retrieving files into a
blob column.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stefan Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:03 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oralrnr@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bigger block sizes
This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click
links from unknown senders or unexpected email.
________________________________
Hi Orlando,
it depends (as always).
Franck Pachot has written a great blog post with several demos about this
topic: http://blog.dbi-services.com/do-the-block-size-matter/
Best Regards
Stefan Koehler
Freelance Oracle performance consultant and researcher
Homepage: http://www.soocs.de
Twitter: @OracleSK
Orlando L <oralrnr@xxxxxxxxx> hat am 30. September 2015 um 23:29 geschrieben:--
List,
Does anyone in the list use non default blocksize of greater than 8K for your
oracle DBs; if so, is it for warehousing/OLAP type applications?
What advantages do you get with them; any disadvantage.
Orlando.
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
��i��0���zX���+�� n��{�+i�^l===
