Re: Any issues with Sun Coothreads Servers?

  • From: "Jeffery Thomas" <jeffthomas24@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:52:10 -0500

How does this forebode for our plans to purchase a pair of T5120s for a 10g
RAC environment?

Thanks,
Jeff


On Dec 6, 2007 9:56 PM, Tanel Poder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This link below is not from an Oracle benchmark, but still a database
> one...
> unless you have many parallel threads of work running (nightly batch jobs
> for example), the CPU peformance can suck...
>
>
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/8/database-test-sun-ultrasparc-t1-vs-amd-opt
> eron-pagina-8.html
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tanel Poder
> http://blog.tanelpoder.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lou Avrami
> > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 04:48
> > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Any issues with Sun Coothreads Servers?
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The organization where I am working needs to buy some Sun
> > Sparc servers for a new project.  Some of the server models
> > are consideration are the T2000, the T5120 and the T5220.
> > They have requested that I ask if anyone has had any negative
> > experiences with Sun's multi-core, multithreaded CoolThreads
> > servers running Oracle.
> >
> > Any feedback, good or bad, would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lou Avrami
> > --
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

Other related posts: