Re: Alert 68 8i patch for windows
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:10:36 -0400
downloaded? how about applied?
the readme.txt lacks details as to what actions are necessary if the
previous 8.1.7.4.16 patchset was applied. lovely.
guess I could remove that oracle software installation and reclone
from the source database that I used in the prior iteration.
what a huge waste of time.
guess that I'd rather waste an iTAR than nuke that install and re-clone.
I'll see what happens with the iTAR and report back.
Pd
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:03:45 +0100, Niall Litchfield
<niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:49:49 -0300, Boivin, Patrice J
>
>
> <boivinp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > For alert 68, Oracle re-posted the 8i for windows patch on September 4th.
> >
> > If you downloaded it before that date, download it again.
> >
> > Keep an eye on the patchset size.
> >
> > Pat.
> Good job they had the much publicised delay for these fixes so that
> the relase of the patchset would be more streamlined!
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
--
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To search the archives - //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
Other related posts:
