RE: ASM/MetaLUN
- From: "Henry Poras" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:07:04 -0500
Thanks. Pete sounded upbeat about ASM a few days ago:) Maybe it's something
in the water cooler.
This is mainly exploratory for now. Working through various options.
Henry
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 1:43 PM
To: henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ASM/MetaLUN
ASM is still rather bleeding edge.
If you're considering this for production use you may want to wait for
10gR2.
Jared
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:21:55 -0500, Henry Poras <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I have been reading through some EMC docs as well as Oracle ASM stuff,
> trying to understand what would be a reasonable setup (the recent
> Storage
...
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
