RE: ASM normal redundancy vs external redundancy
- From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:54:37 -0800
Queries on tables which reside on the tablespace that is placed with
external redudancy ASM disk were giving faster result than tables which
reside with tablespace placed with ASM normal redundancy.
...Can you give some details about the workload (scans, random I/O) and
the actual performance difference you are seeing?
Other related posts:
