Re: ACFS

  • From: Kenny Payton <k3nnyp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: RajeevGM <rprabha01@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:34:06 -0400

Thanks Rajeev.

You don’t happen to be using HANFS are you?

Kenny


On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, RajeevGM <rprabha01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Kenny,

We are using ACFS for the last few years on a two node 11.2.0.2 and
a 11.2.0.3 RAC environment.

Shutting down these mount points can be a pain at times if you have a tight
maintenance window.

Also, I recall facing some stability issues with them on 11.2.0.2 (Solaris
platform),
but, we were able to get past them and it was stable from that point onwards.

On Solaris, we had to apply the patch 14617206 to address the issue of os
commands hanging issue.
-Rajeev

On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anyone running ACFS with any scale? I've ran it on a fairly small scale but
nothing of any size. I'm starting to look at it for 60-70T content share
with 40-50 clients. I'd rather expose it as NFS rather than install it on
every client but looking for resiliency and clustering. It seems to have
all of the features I'll need ( ie. snapshot, replication and encryption ).

I can also break this 40-50T up into a good number of smaller chunks ( < 5T
) and could actually build multiple clusters as opposed to one large one.
Each cluster would present data to a subset of the clients.

Looking for success stories, horror stories or just words of enlightenment.


Thanks,
Kenny




--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: