Re: 9iRAC or 10GRAC?

  • From: Alexander Gorbachev <gorbyx@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: susanzlam@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:35:22 +0100

As far as I understand, architecturally there is not much new in 10gR2
(ever R1) in regard to RAC. Recently, we had a workshop with an Oracle
guy in charge of 10gR2 RAC development and my impression was that
there are very few things really new in 10g - like CRS and the whole
cluster software stack from Oracle, dinamic block remastering, ASM,
and something else, but not really a lot. Anyway, we wouldn't use any
of these new features since they are too new.
On the other hand, with 9i we've hit some...
limitations/bugs/"features" that are only fixed/improved/etc. in
10gR2. I don't have exact list handy, but that's my impression.

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:36:20 -0800 (PST), susan lam <susanzlam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We have been planning on implementing 9i RAC solution
> for the last few months. Since 10G R2 will probably be
> available within the next 6months, I think we should
> put our implementation on hold until R2 is released.
> 
> What advantages do 10G RAC has over 9iRAC? For one, I
> think with the EM Grid Control, it's easier to manage
> the environment. If you have a document to point me
> to, I would appreciate that too.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> susan
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: