RE: 9i DataGuard, RAC primary - secondary offline for network maintenance
- From: "Ric Van Dyke" <ric.van.dyke@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:34:19 -0600
It of course may take awhile to catch up, but you really shouldn't have
any problems. I've caught up standbys that were days behind. Just got
to have all the log files!
Ric Van Dyke
Hotsos Enterprises
-----------------------
Hotsos Symposium March 4-8, 2007. Be there.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Sequeira
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:10 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: 9i DataGuard, RAC primary - secondary offline for network
maintenance
Hi all,
I have a 2 node 9i RAC primary (Win 2003), 9.2.0.6 mandated by the
application.
Have a physical standby 9.2.0.7.
All appears to be going well, teething problems over (touch wood).
The primary is running in maximum performance mode.
The secondary server is due to go down for about 24 hours for absolutely
vital electrical maintenance work.
I believe that this will be OK, and that the secondary will catch up
when brought online again.
Any think or know different? I'm trying to plan for any glitches now,
the primary database is a vital 24/7 system.
I am aware of Note:259804.1 - particularly the section 'Real
Application Clusters and Data Guard Redo Apply During a Network
Outage'.
Many thanks.
--
Tony Sequeira
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
