RE: issues?

  • From: "Christian Antognini" <Christian.Antognini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <Leng.Kaing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:15:18 +0200


> Actually, problem #3 has been identified as bug 5548043 - 'STATID is
> intended to be an "identifier" type parameter  but the value passed
> in here is not a valid identifier

I already saw this problem by a couple of my customers that upgraded to
10.2. As far as I remember this is not a bug, i.e. it works as designed.

What's new for me it's that they back ported this 10g behavior to 9i
with that patch. Nice to know, thank you.


Other related posts: