RE: 9207 in prod

  • From: "Connor McDonald" <mcdonald.connor@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:08:15 +0800


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> caseydyke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, 14 September 2006 8:53 AM
> To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fairlie rego
> Subject: 9207 in prod
> Folks,
> Just trying to get a feel for community comfort w/9207 in 
> prod.  

I can't comment on 9208 but we've had a number of dramas with 9207 (solaris
32bit single instance), mainly related to

a) shared pool issues (but our app's not a shining example of good shared
pool use)
b) parallel query slaves spinning
c) ora-600's, 7445's on more "leading edge" things (multi-table insert,
merge command)

Another client runs RAC solaris 32bit and I quote: 'moving from 9204 to 9207
was a big mistake'  (they're now moving to linux...)

So even unseen, I'd probably recommend you give 9208 a whirl...



Other related posts: