RE: > 2 Tb disk under ASM - RHEL 5.3/11.2.0.3
- From: Gerald Cunningham <gcunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "tim@xxxxxxxxx" <tim@xxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:52:36 -0500
Thanks Tim!
I think you are right...
Jerry
________________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Tim Gorman [tim@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 7:23 PM
To: Gerald Cunningham; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: > 2 Tb disk under ASM - RHEL 5.3/11.2.0.3
Yes, we ran into it under 10.2.0.x. Actually what happened is that 10gR2 ASM
permitted us to create the huge ASM disk (no error message), but then gave
errors after ASM tried to use the space above 2 Tb, several months later,
resulting in corruption which led to a 14 Tb tablespace recovery.
Since the patch in 10gR2 was only supposed to throw the error when you tried to
add a disk larger than 2 Tb, I think you are seeing the correct post-patch
behavior. The patch throws the error -- it still does not permit you to add a
disk larger than 2Tb. I could be wrong, but be sure to look at the notes in
Support with that possible understanding...
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Cunningham [mailto:gcunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 04:49 PM
To: 'Gerald Cunningham', oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: > 2 Tb disk under ASM - RHEL 5.3/11.2.0.3
slight correction 2097152 *Mbs*________________________________________From:
oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Gerald Cunningham [gcunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012
6:35 PMTo: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > 2 Tb disk under ASM - RHEL
5.3/11.2.0.3All,I'm getting the following error when trying to add a 3 Tb ASM
disk under 11.2.0.3 ASM on REL 5.3:ORA-15099 disk is larger than the maximum
size of 2097152 bytesLooks like it may be bug 10072750 or 6453944.8...Has
anybody run into this? Is there a patch or workaround? The patch set notes for
11.2.0.3 say this is supposed to be fixed.Thanks very much for any
help,Jerry--//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l--Follow this link to mark
it as
spam:http://mailfilter.proteus-technologies.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id,40228475.A03B2--//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Follow this link to mark it as spam:
http://mailfilter.proteus-technologies.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=5067C28475.A0BF5
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
