Re: 11g Windows

  • From: "Derya Oktay" <deryaoktay@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:44:29 +0200

Hello Niall,

I also installed 11g, on windows 2003 sp2 machine running on vmware esx with
1 CPU and 1 GB. And I experienced no problems.

Regards,
Derya.

On 10/31/07, Andre van Winssen <dreveewee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Niall,
>
> I installed 11g for windows couple of times already on windows2003 32 bit
> without any problem during or after the installation and db creation (single
> instance). One server was an ESX windows guest (2VCPU/2GB), the other two
> were physical servers with 4 and 8 CPU's
>
> No complaints sofar, have logged two SR's sofar. A support analyst was
> still thinking that 11.1.0.6 is BETA, another one overruled him that this
> version is production software.
>
> DBControl has some nice improvements
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
>
> 2007/10/30, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > List
> >
> > I've now made two attempts to install 11g on this dell laptop (2gb ram
> > 1700mhz processor) the second having wiped all previous traces of Oracle
> > from the machine. Both times the software installs fine, creating a custom
> > db works fine, but then the CPU hogs at 100% for hours (I've left this
> > overnight in case it was some em madness and come back to 11 hours of cpu
> > usage in a 15 hour period!) Has anyone else experienced this? Right now 11g
> > is leaving a bad taste in my mouth.
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > http://www.orawin.info
> >
>
>

Other related posts: